![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgmmKU_UwJgql-rNdvp_7JUsZ7PwIPWygnp2bO5q4jwqZwiEgCjzzqlsIIR0g7rVlxpyQJXBkZiwpSW-SYlzDTwhWiMUh4q-dmDfFnvLta1kVyTolRYS9ygkuOtCjIogZ2nInnHQ1XynIk/s400/KS+2.jpg)
Fig 3: Dermoscopic image of the same seborrheic keratosis taken
with non polarized dermoscopy (immersion contact dermoscopy)
In an article published in the Archives of Dermatology in 2007 (1) , the authors showed that milia-like cysts and comedo-like openings were better visualized with non polarized dermoscopy (NPD), suggesting that NPD was more helpful for identification of seborrheic keratosis.
1: Benvenuto-Andrade C, Dusza SW, Agero AL, Scope A, Rajadhyaksha M, Halpern AC, Marghoob AA. Arch Dermatol. 2007 Mar; 143(3):329-38. Differences between polarized light dermoscopy and immersion contact dermoscopy for the evaluation of skin lesions.